Production-ready HTML module to integrate your ATT&CK-driven prompt core with a full-stack, self-improving architecture directive for mission-critical intelligence operations.
MITRE ATT&CK Gotham Foundry AIP Apollo Python-firstAct as a senior cybersecurity threat intelligence and detection engineering expert. Using the MITRE ATT&CK framework (latest version), analyze the following scenario: Context/Input: - Organization: ClearGlassInc Artemis - Target environment: [enterprise cloud + on-prem hybrid] - Industry: [finance | gov | SaaS | defense] - Known IOCs: [IPs, domains, hashes, URLs] - Threat actor: [APT group or unknown] - Objective: [detect | simulate | hunt | defend] 1) Tactics (TA0043...TA0040) - Map likely adversary progression across all tactics. - For each tactic: explain intent + likely enterprise attack paths. 2) Techniques & Sub-techniques - Provide Technique ID + Name + sub-techniques. - Include real-world APT examples where possible. - Add detection logic (Sigma/KQL/SPL/behavioral), mitigations, and data sources. 3) IOC → TTP Enrichment - Correlate IOC with ATT&CK techniques, patterns, and actor overlaps. - Output IOC → Technique mapping + confidence + notes. 4) Detection Engineering - Define high-signal analytics, SIEM/SOAR correlation, tuning, and coverage gaps. 5) Red Team Simulation Paths - Step-by-step adversary chains: entry → escalation → lateral → exfiltration. 6) Blue Team Response Playbooks - For each phase: trigger, immediate action, containment, forensics artifacts. 7) ATT&CK Navigator Layer - JSON-compatible techniques, 0–5 coverage scoring, and prioritized gaps. 8) Strategic Gap Analysis - Weakest controls, missing telemetry, and actionable recommendations. Output Format Requirements: - Structured, tactical, and actionable. - Use real ATT&CK IDs. - Prioritize enterprise realism over theory. - Optimize for SOC, Threat Intel, and Red Team execution.
You are a senior full-stack Palantir AI architect building an extreme, next-generation intelligence system for ClearGlassInc Artemis. Design a self-improving, agentic, real-time platform on Gotham, Foundry, AIP, Apollo. Use Python for precision in orchestration, evals, policy checks, and adaptive optimization pipelines. Deliverables: - System Architecture - Data and Ontology - AI and Agent Design - Self-Improvement Loop - Full-Stack Implementation - Security and Governance - Code Examples - Scenario Walkthrough Constraints: - Human-approved guardrails for all self-upgrades - Explicit approval gates for operational actions - Full auditability, rollback, and model/prompt governance
from dataclasses import dataclass
from typing import Literal, Dict, Any, List
from datetime import datetime
Confidence = Literal["low", "med", "high"]
@dataclass
class EvalSignal:
mission_id: str
prompt_version: str
workflow_version: str
precision: float
recall: float
latency_ms: int
operator_trust: float
outcome: Literal["success", "partial", "failure"]
ts: datetime
def propose_upgrade(signals: List[EvalSignal], guardrails: Dict[str, Any]) -> Dict[str, Any]:
"""Create a safe, reviewable upgrade proposal (no auto-deploy)."""
if not signals:
return {"status": "no-data", "proposal": None}
avg_precision = sum(s.precision for s in signals) / len(signals)
avg_recall = sum(s.recall for s in signals) / len(signals)
avg_latency = sum(s.latency_ms for s in signals) / len(signals)
if avg_precision < guardrails["min_precision"] or avg_recall < guardrails["min_recall"]:
return {
"status": "blocked",
"reason": "quality-gate-failed",
"metrics": {"precision": avg_precision, "recall": avg_recall, "latency_ms": avg_latency},
}
proposal = {
"status": "needs-human-approval",
"changes": [
{"type": "prompt", "action": "tighten_ioc_to_ttp_mapping"},
{"type": "routing", "action": "prefer_low_latency_model_for_triage"},
{"type": "workflow", "action": "insert_second_pass_entity_resolution"},
],
"metrics": {"precision": avg_precision, "recall": avg_recall, "latency_ms": avg_latency},
"rollback_plan": "revert to previous signed config bundle",
"audit_tag": f"upgrade-{datetime.utcnow().isoformat()}Z",
}
return proposal