AI architecture · Palantir runtime · governed autonomy

ClearGlassInc Artemis: Full-Stack Blueprint for a Self-Evolving AI Intelligence Platform

A premium engineering design document for a secure, coalition-aware, latency-sensitive, audited intelligence platform that fuses live and historical data, reasons over ontology objects, learns from operator feedback, and proposes safe workflow upgrades inside human-approved guardrails.

Published July 18, 202634 min readProduction blueprint

System Architecture

ClearGlassInc Artemis uses Gotham for operational intelligence, investigations, entity tracking, link analysis, cases, and mission timelines; Foundry for integration, ontology, pipelines, transformations, and application logic; AIP for copilots, agents, evaluations, tool-use, model routing, and workflow automation; and Apollo for secure deployment, runtime control, rollback, ring releases, and continuous operations.

Frontend

Analyst workbench, commander cockpit, governance review board, alert rail, graph canvas, approval queue, eval dashboard, and mission playback UI built as a policy-aware TypeScript application.

Backend

Python FastAPI services for identity context, case orchestration, feedback capture, tool brokering, eval generation, model routing, audit writes, and Apollo release promotion.

Data layer

Streaming and batch ingestion land in Foundry-style bronze, silver, and gold datasets, then bind to ontology objects with lineage hashes, sensitivity labels, temporal validity, and confidence.

Policy layer

Need-to-know authorization is enforced at row, column, entity, relationship, derived-output, tool, prompt, model, and action levels before humans or agents can consume or act.

Data and Ontology

The ontology is the operating model. Agents do not reason over loose blobs; they reason over typed objects, relationships, lineage, permissions, caveats, and time. Core entities include Person, Organization, Asset, Location, CyberIndicator, Event, Source, Case, Mission, IntelProduct, ApprovalDecision, ModelVersion, PromptVersion, WorkflowVersion, EvalRun, and OperatorFeedback.

CREATE TABLE ontology_event (
  event_id TEXT PRIMARY KEY,
  event_type TEXT NOT NULL,
  valid_time TSRANGE NOT NULL,
  ingest_time TIMESTAMPTZ NOT NULL DEFAULT now(),
  confidence NUMERIC CHECK (confidence BETWEEN 0 AND 1),
  source_ids TEXT[] NOT NULL,
  lineage_hash TEXT NOT NULL,
  sensitivity TEXT NOT NULL,
  compartments TEXT[] NOT NULL,
  coalition_releasability TEXT[] NOT NULL,
  mission_context JSONB NOT NULL
);

CREATE TABLE ontology_relationship (
  subject_id TEXT NOT NULL,
  predicate TEXT NOT NULL,
  object_id TEXT NOT NULL,
  confidence NUMERIC NOT NULL,
  derived_from TEXT[] NOT NULL,
  valid_time TSRANGE NOT NULL,
  PRIMARY KEY (subject_id, predicate, object_id, valid_time)
);

Relationships include observed_at, associated_with, controls, communicates_with, derived_from, approved_by, contradicts, supersedes, mitigated_by, escalated_to, and releasable_to. Each relationship carries confidence, provenance, caveats, temporal state, and policy labels so the same graph drives analyst workflows and AI guardrails.

AI and Agent Design

Analyst Copilot

Explains evidence, drafts hypotheses, builds link-analysis pivots, summarizes cases, asks clarifying questions, and cites object IDs plus lineage hashes.

Commander Copilot

Compresses mission state into decision briefs, options, risk, confidence, constraints, and approval-required action packages.

Agent mesh

Triage, enrichment, correlation, summarization, recommendation, eval-generation, and red-team agents cooperate through a governed workflow bus.

Tool broker

Agents query ontology, search indexes, vector retrieval, case APIs, ticketing systems, and report generators through scoped, logged, policy-checked tools.

from pydantic import BaseModel

class ToolRequest(BaseModel):
    tool: str
    arguments: dict
    purpose: str
    mission_id: str

async def execute_tool(req: ToolRequest, user, policy, audit):
    decision = policy.authorize(
        actor=user.subject,
        action=f"tool:{req.tool}",
        resource=req.arguments,
        context={"purpose": req.purpose, "mission_id": req.mission_id},
    )
    audit.write("tool.authorize", req.model_dump(), decision.model_dump())
    if not decision.allow:
        raise PermissionError(decision.reason)
    result = await TOOL_REGISTRY[req.tool](**decision.filtered_arguments)
    audit.write("tool.result", {"tool": req.tool}, {"lineage": result.lineage})
    return result

Self-Improvement Loop

Artemis gets better by converting operator corrections, feedback, query logs, alert outcomes, mission results, latency metrics, and case-review decisions into evals and proposed changes. It can propose prompt updates, workflow updates, heuristic changes, model-routing changes, and decision-logic changes, but cannot promote them without explicit human approval and Apollo-controlled deployment.

  1. Capture signals: thumbs, written corrections, accepted/rejected recommendations, false positives, false negatives, time-to-triage, escalation outcomes, and mission impact.
  2. Generate evals: transform failures and high-quality operator corrections into reproducible eval cases with expected outputs, forbidden outputs, source constraints, and policy constraints.
  3. Propose changes: create versioned PromptVersion, WorkflowVersion, RouterPolicyVersion, and HeuristicVersion objects with rationale, expected metric lift, blast radius, and rollback plan.
  4. Review and canary: humans approve in a governance board; Apollo deploys to a small ring with health gates and automatic rollback.
  5. Measure: compare precision, recall, latency, hallucination rate, citation integrity, policy-denial accuracy, operator trust, and mission impact.
def propose_upgrade(eval_report, registry):
    if eval_report.policy_violations:
        return None
    candidate = registry.create_prompt_candidate(
        parent=eval_report.prompt_version,
        patch=eval_report.recommended_prompt_patch,
        rationale=eval_report.root_cause,
        guardrails=["no autonomous mission-goal changes", "cite lineage", "approval before action"],
    )
    candidate.status = "PENDING_HUMAN_REVIEW"
    candidate.rollback_to = eval_report.prompt_version
    return candidate

Full-Stack Implementation

from fastapi import FastAPI, Depends
from pydantic import BaseModel
from datetime import datetime

app = FastAPI(title="ClearGlassInc Artemis Control API")

class FeedbackIn(BaseModel):
    mission_id: str
    case_id: str
    agent_run_id: str
    rating: int
    correction: str | None = None
    outcome: str

@app.post("/feedback")
async def capture_feedback(payload: FeedbackIn, user=Depends(current_user)):
    assert_authorized(user, "feedback:create", payload.mission_id)
    record = {
        **payload.model_dump(),
        "operator_id": user.sub,
        "captured_at": datetime.utcnow().isoformat(),
        "lineage_hash": hash_payload(payload.model_dump()),
    }
    await event_bus.publish("operator.feedback.captured", record)
    await audit_log.append("feedback.captured", actor=user.sub, record=record)
    return {"accepted": True, "feedback_id": record["lineage_hash"]}
states:
  ingest_event:
    on_success: [triage]
  triage:
    agents: [deduplicate, severity_score, policy_scope]
    on_high_confidence: [enrich]
    on_low_confidence: [analyst_review]
  enrich:
    agents: [asset_context, threat_context, mission_context]
    on_success: [recommend]
  recommend:
    requires: [evidence_links, confidence, alternatives, risk]
    next: [approval_gate]
  approval_gate:
    human_required: true
    on_approve: [execute_or_package]
    on_reject: [capture_counterexample]
  capture_counterexample:
    next: [eval_backlog]

Security and Governance

ClearGlassInc Artemis treats every human, service, agent, model, prompt, workflow, tool, dataset, and generated artifact as a governed principal or resource. Zero-trust execution means no implicit trust for internal services, no hidden agent privileges, no unlogged tool calls, no unversioned prompts, and no operationally significant autonomous actions.

Scenario Walkthrough

A live intel event enters through the streaming layer: a suspicious infrastructure change overlaps with a known campaign pattern and a mission-critical asset. Foundry binds the event to CyberIndicator, Asset, Organization, Mission, and Case objects with lineage. The triage agent clusters it against historical events, suppresses duplicate noise, and escalates because business criticality and exploitability align. The enrichment agent queries asset posture, public reporting, internal controls, and recent cases; the correlation agent finds a weak relationship to prior incidents but marks it medium confidence.

The recommendation agent produces a response package: monitor, block candidate domain, validate supplier ownership, and open a case. The block action is operationally significant, so Artemis stops at an approval gate. The operator approves monitoring and case creation, rejects blocking due to insufficient confidence, and adds a correction explaining the supplier context. Artemis stores that rejection as OperatorFeedback, creates an eval case that penalizes over-aggressive blocking for similar supplier contexts, proposes a workflow threshold change, routes it to human review, and deploys only after approval through Apollo canary rings with rollback enabled.

Logo System Addendum

For brand alignment, the Artemis experience should use a production-ready ClearGlass Inc. logo system: a proprietary geometric CG symbol formed from interlocking transparent glass planes, restrained cyan energy pulse, precision-cut architectural geometry, subtle refraction, and a strong central silhouette. Deliverables should include horizontal, stacked, symbol-only, wordmark-only, dark, light, monochrome, no-glow, favicon, app icon, social icon, and Open Graph variants, with square exports at 180, 192, 256, and 512 pixels plus favicon.ico at 16, 32, and 48 pixels.